Showing posts with label Wayne Kramer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wayne Kramer. Show all posts

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Running Scared

‘Running Scared as Hell’

I don’t believe I can begin to explain how disappointed I am with Wayne Kramer’s Running Scared starring Paul Walker. I recently reviewed Kramer’s more famous work The Cooler and so when I found out Running Scared was his most recent film, I had to see it. In truth, I feel that Kramer must have been struck by the inconsistency bug since he wrote both films and directed them both but one is infinitely better than the other. The reasons why? The writing, acting, and length.

Notice I did not mention direction because it is obvious in this movie that Kramer is a natural director. The visualization of scenes and shootouts and how to piece it all together must have required great vision and a hell of a lot of planning. The effects are mind-boggling and the editing is exquisite. The only real editing/directorial problem is the time. By the end of the movie, you will probably find yourself in the lobby trying to get away for a breather at least before you have to go endure more badly planned twists and turns. The last 30 minutes of the movie should have been cut down and should have been made clear. I still have no idea what Paul Walker was talking about that caused everyone to kill each other on the ice for the big shootout finale. At least the cinematography never relents. Kramer layers on the gritty feel in the scenes and the lighting and camera angles only accent this visual idea. Now if only it had been a good script.

Kramer’s writing isn’t bad, it just is devoid of almost all character emotions. It rambles and twists taking the audience along for a ride to …? Anyone? It honestly reminds me of Ultraviolet, the sophomoric failure of director Kurt Wimmer which, interestingly, share one of the same kid actors. The story of both tend not to follow any emotional continuity between scenes and therefore are strong on style but very weak on plot and acting. Running Scared almost feels like a poorly sketched commentary on corrupt city society. The cops are corrupt, mafia kills at will, pimps will kill their hoes whom have dreams, fathers are abusive, etc. Only at the end of the film after the fake burial of Walker’s character does it seem that the main character’s find peace out on a farm. Other ideas that support this theory that it is really a commentary on corrupt city society is the John Wayne thing going on with Oleg’s tweaked out abusive father and the stupid lines given by the pimp right before he is killed, “say hello to my little friend”, (WTF!!) and even the tangential storyline of Oleg being kidnapped by some scary crazy child molesters and killers. It makes me scared as hell of ever thinking of living near LA (I think that is where it takes place). However, the twists and turns are never explained in any rational manner. Some of it is honestly just too coincidental to be believable which supports my theory, but takes any emotional interest out of the film. For example, after killing the murderous molesters, Walker’s wife (Vera Farmiga) meets with Walkers character and decides to say then that she has seen real evil tonight. No remorse, just regret, probably at living in the city. Well, enough with this theory, time to move on to the acting theory.

The acting theory for this film is very simple. Perhaps if the leading man had been better or at least a more honed actor, the film and it’s underlining points could be emphasized better and contain more empathy from the audience. Walker plays his character a little too angry and over the top all the damn time and honestly I’m hoping he dies by the end of the movie. The character’s one time to really grab the audience is when he tries to have sex with his wife, a little too roughly, when she doesn’t seem that interested. He comes across as a rascist anti-russian sort of thug. At the end, pointing out he is an undercover cop does not excuse his behavior before. The one saving grace for him and his family is that he never hits his family or even threatens to unless he is joking with them. That is it. He treats his poor ailing father appalingly (who never has a real point in the story). Walker feels like someone just walking through the emotions of anxious, angry, and upset all the time and he is such a crummy person that I doubt anyone cares for him. As for his family, Vera Farmiga does a decent job as his wife and there does seem to be some sort of caring for Walker’s character. She plays the part of the distressed mother well. Alex Neuberger does a decent job of being Walker’s son and even Cameron Bright, whom I wonder about being a potential killer of films, gives a great show. I’m sorry if I seem harsh on Bright, but I haven’t seen much acting out of the kid to warrant being a lead kid actor in two movies now. I will say this, he looks creepy as hell and seeing him with a gun brings back memories of the Gorillaz song “Kids with Guns”. It’s true, the kid would be great in a remake of the Caulkin classic The Good Son. Everybody pulls off only an okay job in this film, which is impressive given the wandering storyline. Yet, the main lead actor, who we as an audience should worry about getting killed, does worse than the rest. I was worried throughout the movie for his family, never for him. Walker shows some possible potential, but right now he needs to focus on expanding himself and stick to supporting roles. He’s just not ready to carry a movie. The only actor I found myself truly interested in was Karel Roden who plays a despicable father for most of the film.

Conclusion

A good try on this film and it is very appealing visually, but Kramer needs to make it more concise and clear as a story just what the hell is going on. It needs some better actors in the cast or at least more emotional writing. Perhaps if Kramer had focused more on the relationships between characters instead of the visual tone, the film could have been better. In the end, interesting but might want to be left off of Kramer’s resume.

2.6 out 5

Wannabe

Thursday, November 16, 2006

The Cooler

The Perfect Independent Film, ‘The Cooler’

Now, for those who don’t know, I am a self-professed William H. Macy lover. The man seems to be one of the hardest working actors ever and even in films that flop, he still manages to shine like a mirror in the sun. I have long awaited every year to see him receive an Oscar, just one! But no, he’s always overlooked as playing the silent one too well. So yes, this review is probably gently angled in his favor. With that being recognized, I still whole heartedly believe that he deserves an Oscar for his turn in The Cooler. Maria Bello also deserved a nomination. The fact that neither Macy nor Bello were nominated indicates just how stiff the competition was for 2004. At least Alec Baldwin got nominated for his outstanding work.

In Wayne Kramer’s film about an unlucky man and his trip to find happiness, not a single performance disappoints. Baldwin and Macy control the show as they allow the viewer small but insightful glimpses into their disturbing friendship. Baldwin pulls off the feat of being both vicious and protective. He’s like a dog who has found his favorite bone and doesn’t want to let go of it for anything. Macy on the other hand is the unhappy and unlucky employee who struggles to find something worthwhile in his every day. Not only that, but Maria Bello pulls off her part more than convincingly as Lady Luck. Even Jesse Bradley turns in a spirited performance as the annoying undergrad consultant. Wayne Kramer, of recent Running Scared fame, really flexes his director muscle in this piece. How? By not being apparent anywhere in the film. Seriously, the hardest trick for a production to pull off is the feel of being told in front of your eyes for the first time. The shots are all well planned as are the montages, the actors perform exquisitely well and the script, my God, the script is amazing!

From a popular viewpoint the script is good or just okay (hey, it has a semi happy ending which is good, right?), but what most people don’t realize is the amount of work put into a produce-able script. The only expensive location in the film had to have been the casino. By using only a relatively few cheap locations and keeping the excitement to character interactions and dialogue, it allows money that would be tied up in the budgeting process to be freed for things like better actors or more creative editing. Also, the twists and turns jump off the screen at times and makes you re-evaluate what you had already seen. Another great feat of the script is that the presence of Vegas is felt in every character and scene. It’s an oppressive, flashy hammer that pounds on everyone in the movie to create a sense of destiny. I recommend the script to anyone who would think of writing for film as an excellent example of what to write, especially to start off your career as a potential director.

Other great features of the film? The sound editing is actually quite superb in every way. The sound reflects everything from atmosphere to pacing and occasionally allows insight into Macy’s character. The music itself is not necessarily memorable and is mostly the standard Vegas fare, but the sound effects and the timing really adds a lot to this story and is layered and interwoven brilliantly into the dialogue and action on screen. Another great touch was the idea for the special lighting whenever Bernie (Macy’s character) is in a good mood and his luck changes. The lighting adds a nice touch of flare and a brief escape of hope in the audience for Macy’s character since it comes so rarely and he is pitiable.

4.5 out of 5

Wannabe